Science Literacy

  • 4.3
Approx. 23 hours to complete

Course Summary

This course explores the basic principles and concepts of science literacy. It covers a range of topics from scientific methodology to scientific inquiry and critical thinking.

Key Learning Points

  • Understand the basic principles and concepts of science literacy
  • Develop critical thinking skills through scientific inquiry
  • Learn how to evaluate scientific information and media

Job Positions & Salaries of people who have taken this course might have

  • Science Writer
    • USA: $62,000
    • India: INR 4,48,000
    • Spain: €35,000
  • Science Communication Specialist
    • USA: $55,000
    • India: INR 4,00,000
    • Spain: €30,000
  • Science Educator
    • USA: $50,000
    • India: INR 3,60,000
    • Spain: €27,000

Related Topics for further study


Learning Outcomes

  • Develop a deeper understanding of scientific concepts
  • Improve critical thinking skills
  • Learn how to evaluate scientific information and media

Prerequisites or good to have knowledge before taking this course

  • Basic understanding of scientific concepts
  • Access to internet

Course Difficulty Level

Beginner

Course Format

  • Online self-paced course
  • Video lectures
  • Interactive quizzes

Similar Courses

  • Scientific Thinking and Communication
  • Science Writing and Journalism

Related Education Paths


Notable People in This Field

  • Neil deGrasse Tyson
  • Bill Nye

Related Books

Description

Fake news or good science? In a world where we have access to unlimited information, it is hard to sift through the echo chamber of opinions fueled by emotions and personal biases, rather than scientific evidence. Science Literacy will teach you about the process of science, how to think critically, how to differentiate science from pseudoscience, how indigenous wisdom can inform science, how to understand and design a scientific study, and how to critically evaluate scientific communication in the media. Every module will build your new skill-base with real life examples, and at the end of each module you will have to apply these skills to scientific questions, talking points and controversies in the world. Warning: this course requires an open mind and the ability to self-reflect.

Knowledge

  • Learn how to think critically and understand the scientific method
  • Learn how to form well balanced and logical scientific arguments, read and design scientific research papers
  • Learn how to differentiate and discriminate science from pseudoscience, fake science and bad science
  • Become scientifically literate, and be able to critically evaluate information in the mainstream and social media, as well as every day life

Outline

  • Module 1: Introduction to Science
  • Welcome to Science Literacy
  • A Difference of Opinion
  • Heuristics
  • Science isn't "Just a Theory"
  • Traditional Knowledge: Part 1
  • Traditional Knowledge: Part 2
  • Traditional Knowledge: Part 3
  • Creating Convincing Arguments
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Empirical, anecdotal or logical
  • Biases in Decision-Making
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Types of Bias
  • Science and Not Science
  • Metaphysical Thought
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Metaphysical
  • Accumulating Knowledge
  • Suggested Reading
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Traditional and Scientific Knowledge
  • Empirical evidence
  • Pre-flection: Common Sense and Intuition
  • Common sense and intuition
  • End of Module 1 Quiz
  • Module 2: Pseudoscience
  • Pseudoscience and Science-ploitation
  • Fraud Science, Bad Science or Pseudoscience?
  • Why do we fall for Pseudoscience?
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Science vs Pseudoscience
  • Watch and Reflect: Hallmarks of Pseudoscience
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Hallmarks of Science vs Hallmarks of Pseudoscience
  • Logical Fallacies
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Logical Fallacies
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Uncertainty Vs Logic
  • Carl Sagan: The Demon Haunted World
  • Preflection: Science or Pseuodoscience?
  • Science or Pseuodoscience? Review
  • Science, Fraudulent Science or Bad Science?
  • Uncertainty
  • Uncertainty Review
  • Video reflection: Skeptical or not?
  • The Demon-Haunted World: Reflection
  • The Demon-Haunted World: Reflection II
  • The Demon-Haunted World: Reflection III
  • End of Module 2 Quiz
  • Module 3: Critical Thinking
  • Alternative explanations
  • Correlation is not Causation
  • Replicability in Evidence
  • The Strength of Evidence
  • Falsifiability
  • Occam's Razor
  • The Who, What, Why, When and How of Critical Thinking
  • Thinking Critically about a Claim
  • Thinking Critically About a Claim 2
  • Revisiting terms about Correlation-Causation
  • Article: Illusions of Causality
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Correlation, Not Causation
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Replicability
  • The 3 Rs
  • Why didn't the bird cross the road?
  • Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence
  • Watch and Reflect: How did our view of the Universe Change?
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Claims Proportional to the Evidence
  • Ylang Ylang Evidence Review
  • Karl Popper
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Falsifiability and Risky Predictions
  • Watch and Reflect: Falsifiability
  • Onsite inspection of reputed UFO landing marks at Duhamel, Alberta
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Making Fewest Possible Assumptions
  • Recommended listening and reflection
  • Reflection: Critical Thinking or not?
  • Lesson Reflection
  • Assessing Associations 1
  • Assessing Associations 2
  • Replicability
  • Why didn't the bird cross the road?
  • Astronomy Video Reflection
  • Lesson Preflection: Falsifiability
  • UFO or UF-NO?
  • End of Module 3 Quiz
  • Module 4: Scientific Methods
  • Variables
  • Research techniques and models
  • Sampling
  • Correlation
  • What is in a Scientific Paper?
  • What Can Blind Fish Teach Us About Sleep?
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Critical Thinking and the Scientific Method
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Variables
  • What is a hypothesis
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Hypothesis testing
  • Research Design 1
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Population Sample
  • Research Design 2
  • Research Design 3
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Surveys
  • Research Design 4
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Research Design Case Study
  • End of Module 4 Quiz
  • Module 5: Interpreting Evidence
  • Peer Review: the scientist's perspective
  • Statistics
  • Science Communication
  • Sharpening and Levelling
  • Science Vs Opinions
  • Scientists can miscommunicate their science too!
  • Congratulations!
  • Watch and Reflect: What is Peer Review?
  • Read a Peer Reviewed Article
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Evidence Based Conclusions from Primary and Secondary Sources
  • Watch and Reflect: Descriptive Statistics
  • How Scientists Use Statistics, Samples, and Probability to Answer Research Questions
  • Watch and Reflect: Inferential Statistics
  • Using Inferential Statistics
  • Drag and Drop Activty: Descriptive and Inferential Statistics
  • How to avoid statistical errors
  • When statistical significance is not practically significant
  • Watch and Reflect: Statistical vs Practical Significance
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Practical vs Statistical Significance
  • Watch and Reflect: The Importance of media communicating science
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Problems and Solutions in Science Reporting
  • Suggested Listening: Torah Kachur
  • News Coverage of A Scientific Finding
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Sharpening, Levelling or Pseudosymmetry
  • Disparity in claim on social media and strength of supporting evidence
  • Watch and reflect: Social Media
  • Watch and reflect: Scientists Communicating Science
  • Rules for Scientists Communicating Science
  • Scientists "digesting" their science to a general audience
  • Writing Your Digest
  • Drag and Drop Activity: Spreading and Stopping Misinformation
  • Watch and Reflect: Insist on Evidence- Open Data
  • Preflection: What is Peer Review?
  • Assessing the meaning of statistics
  • Case Study: Biofilm
  • Abstract and Highlights
  • News Coverage Article Reflection
  • Sharpening and Levelling
  • Open Data
  • End of Module 5 Quiz

Summary of User Reviews

The Science Literacy course on Coursera received positive reviews from many users. It is considered a great course for those who are interested in science and want to improve their scientific literacy. Many users found the course to be engaging, informative, and well-structured.

Key Aspect Users Liked About This Course

The course content and structure were highly praised by many users.

Pros from User Reviews

  • Engaging and informative course content
  • Well-structured course with clear objectives
  • Great for improving scientific literacy
  • Interactive and hands-on learning experience
  • Accessible for beginners and experts alike

Cons from User Reviews

  • Some users found the course to be too basic
  • Course materials could be more diverse
  • Limited interactions with instructors
  • Not enough opportunities for peer-to-peer interaction
  • Some technical issues with the course platform
English
Available now
Approx. 23 hours to complete
Dr. Claire Scavuzzo
University of Alberta
Coursera

Instructor

Dr. Claire Scavuzzo

  • 4.3 Raiting
Share
Saved Course list
Cancel
Get Course Update
Computer Courses